Sheridan v Sheridan
Annotate this CaseDecided on June 19, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
314 CA 14-00765
[*1]KELLY G. SHERIDAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
DAVID E. SHERIDAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
KELLY M. CORBETT, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAYETTEVILLE.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Martha E. Mulroy, A.J.), entered February 3, 2014. The order denied defendant's motion to expand his parenting time with his son.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 AD3d 1542, 1545).
Entered: June 19, 2015
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.