Miller v Webb of Buffalo, LLC

Annotate this Case
Miller v Webb of Buffalo, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 02599 Decided on March 27, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 27, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
265 CA 14-01716

[*1]GREGORY MILLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

WEBB OF BUFFALO, LLC, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, BURKE HOMES, LLC, AND TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered December 3, 2013. The order denied the motion and cross motions of defendants for summary judgment.



BURDEN, GULISANO & HICKEY, LLC, BUFFALO (ASHLYN N. MAUSOLF OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT BURKE HOMES, LLC.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (AMANDA L. MACHACEK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.

COHEN & LOMBARDO, P.C., BUFFALO (ERIN E. COLE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (BRIAN R. HOGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion and cross motions are granted, and the complaint and cross claims are dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this Labor Law and common-law negligence action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he fell from a first floor windowsill of a building undergoing renovation and conversion into commercial and residential space. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was employed by a subcontractor that was hired by defendant Time Warner Cable, Inc. (Time Warner), to perform cable installation work at the building. As part of that work, plaintiff was instructed to run a ground wire from a room on the first floor to a lockbox on the exterior of the building. He was unable to locate anyone with a key to the building and therefore used a ladder to enter the room through a window. While plaintiff was completing his task inside the room, his coworkers removed the ladder. According to plaintiff, he was told that the ladder would be returned in a couple of minutes, and he decided to straddle the windowsill while he waited for the ladder. As he sat on the windowsill, plaintiff leaned out to say something to his coworkers, lost his balance, and fell to the ground below.

Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant Burke Homes, LLC, and the cross motions of defendants Webb of Buffalo, LLC, and Time Warner seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them. Defendants met their burden of establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Nalepa v South Hill Bus. Campus, LLC, 123 AD3d 1190, 1193; Kerrigan v TDX Constr. Corp., 108 AD3d 468, 471, lv denied 22 NY3d 862; Capellan v King Wire Co., 19 AD3d 530, 532). Defendants established that there was no causal relationship between any duties owed by them to plaintiff pursuant to the Labor [*2]Law or the common law and the injuries plaintiff sustained, and that they could not reasonably have foreseen that a person in plaintiff's circumstances would not wait for the ladder inside the building (see Mack v Altmans Stage Light. Co., 98 AD2d 468, 472). Before he decided to straddle the windowsill, " [p]laintiff was not in an emergent situation. He was in a position of absolute safety, although subject to inconvenience' " (id., quoting Guida v 154 W. 14th St. Co., 13 AD2d 695, 696, affd 11 NY2d 731). Plaintiff was aware that the ladder would be returned "when he decided to put his safety at risk" by straddling the windowsill, and plaintiff's conduct thus superseded any alleged breach of duty by defendants "and terminated defendants' liability for his injuries" (Egan v A.J. Constr. Corp., 94 NY2d 839, 841; see Misirlakis v East-Coast Entertainment Props., 297 AD2d 312, 312, lv denied 100 NY2d 637; Mack, 98 AD2d at 472-473).

Entered: March 27, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.