People v Serwinowski

People v Serwinowski 2015 NY Slip Op 00174 Decided on January 2, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 2, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1456 KA 13-00940

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

EDMUND M. SERWINOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered May 9, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (MEGAN E. MORAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. We agree with defendant that his waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his challenge to the severity of the sentence because "no mention was made on the record during the course of the allocution concerning the waiver of defendant's right to appeal his conviction that he was also waiving his right to appeal any issue concerning the severity of the sentence' " (People v Lorenz, 119 AD3d 1450, 1450, lv denied 24 NY3d 962, quoting People v Pimentel, 108 AD3d 861, 862, lv denied 21 NY3d 1076). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: January 2, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court