People v Mrzygut
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 23, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1299 KA 14-01663
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
DEANA M. MRZYGUT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (JOSEPH G. FRAZIER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), rendered June 6, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of driving while intoxicated, a class E felony.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of driving while intoxicated as a class E felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [3]; 1193 [1] [c] [i]). "The valid waiver by defendant of [her] right to appeal encompasses [her] challenge to the severity of the sentence and also includes waiver of the right to invoke [this Court's] interest-of-justice jurisdiction' " (People v Keiser, 38 AD3d 1254, 1254, lv denied 9 NY3d 877, reconsideration denied 9 NY3d 991, quoting People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255).
Entered: December 23, 2015
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.