Palumbo v Palumbo

Annotate this Case
Palumbo v Palumbo 2015 NY Slip Op 09482 Decided on December 23, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1289 CA 14-01931

[*1]GARY PALUMBO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

LAUREN PALUMBO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)



MICHAEL A. ROSENHOUSE, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN HUTCHINSON LLP, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY J. CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered May 29, 2014 in a divorce action. The order, among other things, modified the judgment of divorce by adding a provision directing that if the marital residence is not refinanced within 90 days of the date of the judgment, the marital residence is to be sold in conformance with the parties' stipulation.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by providing that, if the marital residence is not refinanced within 90 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, the marital residence is to be sold, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs in accordance with the same memorandum as in Palumbo v Palumbo ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 23, 2015]).

Entered: December 23, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.