People v Gomez

Annotate this Case
People v Gomez 2014 NY Slip Op 07905 Decided on November 14, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2014
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J, CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ. (Filed Nov. 14, 2014.)
MOTION NO. (286/07) KA 05-02660.

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JOSE A. GOMEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal, specifically, whether the court placed on the record a reasonable basis for restraining defendant before the jury. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of March 16, 2007 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois , 151 AD2d 1046). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before February 13, 2015.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.