Freeland v Erie County

Annotate this Case
Freeland v Erie County 2014 NY Slip Op 08143 Decided on November 21, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
928 CA 14-00266

[*1]GLENN FREELAND AND SUSAN FREELAND, AS ADMINISTRATORS FOR THE ESTATE OF TREVELL WALKER, DECEASED, AND AS GUARDIANS OF THE INFANT AND SOLE ISSUE JALEN WALKER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

ERIE COUNTY, MARK POLONCARZ, ERIE COUNTY EXECUTIVE, TIMOTHY B. HOWARD, ERIE COUNTY SHERIFF AND MARK WIPPERMAN, ERIE COUNTY UNDERSHERIFF, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered January 2, 2014. The order granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and dismissed the complaint.



KEVIN T. STOCKER, TONAWANDA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (ANTHONY B. TARGIA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying defendants' motion in part and reinstating the first cause of action by plaintiffs as administrators of the estate of Trevell Walker, deceased, against defendants Erie County, Timothy B. Howard, Erie County Sheriff, and Mark Wipperman, Erie County Undersheriff, and the third cause of action by plaintiffs as administrators of the estate of Trevell Walker, deceased, against defendants Timothy B. Howard, Erie County Sheriff, and Mark Wipperman, Erie County Undersheriff, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Freeland v Erie County ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 21, 2014]).

Entered: November 21, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.