People v Michael F.
Annotate this Case
People v Michael F.
2014 NY Slip Op 03157
Released on May 2, 2014
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on May 2, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
561 KA 12-01080
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
MICHAEL F., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from an adjudication of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered May 15, 2012. The adjudication revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (VINCENT F. GUGINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the adjudication so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: May 2, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on May 2, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
561 KA 12-01080
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
MICHAEL F., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from an adjudication of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), rendered May 15, 2012. The adjudication revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (VINCENT F. GUGINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the adjudication so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: May 2, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
