Reynolds v Kelly
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 14, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1082 CA 14-00428
[*1]SHARELLE REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
RICHARD KELLY, BETTE KELLY AND MARK KELLY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered December 9, 2013. The order denied plaintiff's motion for, inter alia, a protective order striking a certain report.
ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, NEW HARTFORD (MO ATHARI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BOEGGEMAN, GEORGE & CORDE, P.C., ALBANY (PAUL A. HURLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed with costs (see Pagan v Rafter, 107 AD3d 1505, 1507).
Entered: November 14, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.