People ex rel. Dudley v Khahaifa
Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Dudley v Khahaifa
2013 NY Slip Op 06151
Released on September 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on September 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
897 KAH 11-02615
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. FRANK DUDLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
SIBATU KHAHAIFA, SUPERINTENDENT, ORLEANS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), dated August 25, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: September 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on September 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
897 KAH 11-02615
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. FRANK DUDLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
SIBATU KHAHAIFA, SUPERINTENDENT, ORLEANS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), dated August 25, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: September 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
