Walradt v Batavia Family Dental
Annotate this Case
Walradt v Batavia Family Dental
2013 NY Slip Op 06107
Released on September 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on September 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.
834 CA 13-00382
[*1]APRIL WALRADT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
BATAVIA FAMILY DENTAL AND STEVEN SOKOLOVSKIY, D.D.S., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered June 15, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
CHRISTINA A. AGOLA, PLLC, ROCHESTER (RYAN C. WOODWORTH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (SCOTT D. PIPER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on September 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.
834 CA 13-00382
[*1]APRIL WALRADT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
BATAVIA FAMILY DENTAL AND STEVEN SOKOLOVSKIY, D.D.S., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered June 15, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
CHRISTINA A. AGOLA, PLLC, ROCHESTER (RYAN C. WOODWORTH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (SCOTT D. PIPER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
