People v Johnson
Annotate this Case
People v Johnson
2013 NY Slip Op 02968
Released on April 26, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on April 26, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
490 KA 09-00205
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
WAYNE M. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered June 27, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree.
TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ERIN TUBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Released on April 26, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
490 KA 09-00205
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
WAYNE M. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered June 27, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree.
TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ERIN TUBBS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Same Memorandum as in People v Johnson ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Apr. 26, 2013]).
Entered: April 26, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
