Matter of Tidd v Hackett
Annotate this Case
Matter of Tidd v Hackett
2013 NY Slip Op 08781
Released on December 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1394 CAF 13-00780
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH R. TIDD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
MICHELLE L. HACKETT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Judith E. Samber, R.), entered December 3, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, designated petitioner as the primary residential parent of the subject child.
EMILY A. VELLA, SPRINGVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ADAM W. KOCH, WARSAW, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
JAMES ANDREW MUSACCHIO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, GOWANDA.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1394 CAF 13-00780
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH R. TIDD, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
MICHELLE L. HACKETT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Judith E. Samber, R.), entered December 3, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, designated petitioner as the primary residential parent of the subject child.
EMILY A. VELLA, SPRINGVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ADAM W. KOCH, WARSAW, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
JAMES ANDREW MUSACCHIO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, GOWANDA.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
