Matter of Suburban Park Dev. Assn., LLC v Town of Manlius
Annotate this Case
Matter of Suburban Park Dev. Assn., LLC v Town of Manlius
2013 NY Slip Op 08779
Released on December 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1378 CA 13-00854
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SUBURBAN PARK DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
TOWN OF MANLIUS, TOWN OF MANLIUS PLANNING BOARD, FREDERICK GILBERT, DONALD CROSSETT, RICHARD ROSSETTI, ANN KELLY, TOM BYRNES, SUSAN MOLISKI AND JOSEPH LUPIA, JR., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered February 5, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.
LONGSTREET & BERRY, LLP, SYRACUSE (MICHAEL LONGSTREET OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (SVETLANA K. IVY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1378 CA 13-00854
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SUBURBAN PARK DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
TOWN OF MANLIUS, TOWN OF MANLIUS PLANNING BOARD, FREDERICK GILBERT, DONALD CROSSETT, RICHARD ROSSETTI, ANN KELLY, TOM BYRNES, SUSAN MOLISKI AND JOSEPH LUPIA, JR., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brian F. DeJoseph, J.), entered February 5, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition.
LONGSTREET & BERRY, LLP, SYRACUSE (MICHAEL LONGSTREET OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (SVETLANA K. IVY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
