Syracuse Univ. v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Annotate this Case
Syracuse Univ. v National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa.
2013 NY Slip Op 08775
Released on December 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1359 CA 13-01056
[*1]SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered March 7, 2013. The judgment, among other things, denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted the cross motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the second cause of action seeking declaratory relief.
BRESSLER, AMERY & ROSS, P.C., NEW YORK CITY (ROBERT NOVACK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP, NEW YORK CITY (KENNETH H. FRENCHMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1359 CA 13-01056
[*1]SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered March 7, 2013. The judgment, among other things, denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted the cross motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the second cause of action seeking declaratory relief.
BRESSLER, AMERY & ROSS, P.C., NEW YORK CITY (ROBERT NOVACK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP, NEW YORK CITY (KENNETH H. FRENCHMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
