IBC Sales Corp. v Village of Black Riv.
Annotate this Case
IBC Sales Corp. v Village of Black Riv.
2013 NY Slip Op 08713
Released on December 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1241 CA 13-00937
[*1]IBC SALES CORPORATION, UNITED REALTY & DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND FLORIDA FINE CARS AND TRUCKS, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
VILLAGE OF BLACK RIVER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered August 24, 2012. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to file a late notice of claim on defendant.
BANSBACH ZOGHLIN P.C., ROCHESTER (BRIDGET A. O'TOOLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SHANTZ & BELKIN, LATHAM (DEREK L. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1241 CA 13-00937
[*1]IBC SALES CORPORATION, UNITED REALTY & DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND FLORIDA FINE CARS AND TRUCKS, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
VILLAGE OF BLACK RIVER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert, J.), entered August 24, 2012. The order denied the motion of plaintiffs for leave to file a late notice of claim on defendant.
BANSBACH ZOGHLIN P.C., ROCHESTER (BRIDGET A. O'TOOLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SHANTZ & BELKIN, LATHAM (DEREK L. HAYDEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
