Matter of Roberto C.
Annotate this Case
Matter of Roberto C.
2013 NY Slip Op 08710
Released on December 27, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1237 CAF 12-00876
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF ROBERTO C., JR.
SHARON W. AND BRIAN W., PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,
and
ROBERTO C., SR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered May 7, 2012. The order, among other things, adjudged that the petition for the adoption of the subject child may proceed without the respondent's consent.
MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.
MICHAEL N. KALIL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 27, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1237 CAF 12-00876
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF ROBERTO C., JR.
SHARON W. AND BRIAN W., PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,
and
ROBERTO C., SR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, J.), entered May 7, 2012. The order, among other things, adjudged that the petition for the adoption of the subject child may proceed without the respondent's consent.
MARY R. HUMPHREY, NEW HARTFORD, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.
MICHAEL N. KALIL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, UTICA.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: December 27, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
