Martinez v State of New York
Annotate this Case
Martinez v State of New York
2013 NY Slip Op 07646
Released on November 15, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1210 CA 12-01353
[*1]MANUEL MARTINEZ, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,
v
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 119899.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Renee Forgensi Minarik, J.), entered May 16, 2012. The order granted the cross motion of defendant for a protective order relieving it from the responsibility of responding to claimant's interrogatories.
MANUEL MARTINEZ, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1210 CA 12-01353
[*1]MANUEL MARTINEZ, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT,
v
STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (CLAIM NO. 119899.) (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Renee Forgensi Minarik, J.), entered May 16, 2012. The order granted the cross motion of defendant for a protective order relieving it from the responsibility of responding to claimant's interrogatories.
MANUEL MARTINEZ, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Martinez v State of New York ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 15, 2013]).
Entered: November 15, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
