Matter of Grisanti v Smith-Gilsey
Annotate this Case
Matter of Grisanti v Smith-Gilsey
2013 NY Slip Op 07629
Released on November 15, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1186 CAF 12-01092
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD D. GRISANTI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
LINDA SMITH-GILSEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wyoming County (Michael F. Griffith, J.), entered March 28, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, changed respondent's parenting time.
MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
RICHARD D. GRISANTI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
JANE E. MONAGHAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WARSAW.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1186 CAF 12-01092
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD D. GRISANTI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
LINDA SMITH-GILSEY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Wyoming County (Michael F. Griffith, J.), entered March 28, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, changed respondent's parenting time.
MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
RICHARD D. GRISANTI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT PRO SE.
JANE E. MONAGHAN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WARSAW.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Matter of Smith-Gilsey v Grisanti ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 15, 2013]).
Entered: November 15, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.