Siemucha v Garrison
Annotate this Case
Siemucha v Garrison
2013 NY Slip Op 07609
Released on November 15, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1146 CA 12-01544
[*1]PAUL SIEMUCHA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ROBERT D. GARRISON AND CLARNELL HENDERSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Catherine R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), entered June 6, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendants to set aside a jury verdict.
RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, BUFFALO (JOSHUA P. RUBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: November 15, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1146 CA 12-01544
[*1]PAUL SIEMUCHA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
ROBERT D. GARRISON AND CLARNELL HENDERSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Catherine R. Nugent Panepinto, J.), entered June 6, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendants to set aside a jury verdict.
RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, BUFFALO (JOSHUA P. RUBIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: November 15, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
