People v Gayden
Annotate this Case
People v Gayden
2013 NY Slip Op 07597
Released on November 15, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1094 KA 08-00845
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
RAHEEN M. GAYDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Elma A. Bellini, J.), rendered February 15, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree.
EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (LAWRENCE L. KASPEREK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.
Released on November 15, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: FAHEY, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1094 KA 08-00845
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
RAHEEN M. GAYDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Elma A. Bellini, J.), rendered February 15, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree.
EASTON THOMPSON KASPEREK SHIFFRIN LLP, ROCHESTER (LAWRENCE L. KASPEREK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.
Same Memorandum as in People v Gayden ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 15, 2013]).
Entered: November 15, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
