Oneida Indian Nation v Hunt Constr. Group, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Oneida Indian Nation v Hunt Constr. Group, Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 07330 Released on November 8, 2013 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Released on November 8, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1081 CA 13-00693

[*1]THE ONEIDA INDIAN NATION, A SOVEREIGN NATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

HUNT CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 8, 2013. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to dismiss the second through sixth counterclaims of defendant.


MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (W. BRADLEY HUNT OF COUNSEL), AND WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP, WASHINGTON, D.C. FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HANCOCK ESTABROOK LLP, SYRACUSE (JOHN G. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on September 16 and 17, 2013,


It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: November 8, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.