Bauman v Maynard
Annotate this Case
Bauman v Maynard
2013 NY Slip Op 07307
Released on November 8, 2013
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 8, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
1043 CA 13-00727
[*1]ROBERT BAUMAN AND JEANNINE BAUMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
DEBRA MAYNARD, WENDY FARREN, CHARLENE DEYOUNG, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered August 20, 2012. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' complaint following a nonjury trial.
DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARK C. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
CHAMBERLAIN D'AMANDA OPPENHEIMER & GREENFIELD LLP, ROCHESTER (J. MICHAEL WOOD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: November 8, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on November 8, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
1043 CA 13-00727
[*1]ROBERT BAUMAN AND JEANNINE BAUMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
DEBRA MAYNARD, WENDY FARREN, CHARLENE DEYOUNG, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered August 20, 2012. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' complaint following a nonjury trial.
DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARK C. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
CHAMBERLAIN D'AMANDA OPPENHEIMER & GREENFIELD LLP, ROCHESTER (J. MICHAEL WOOD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: November 8, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
