Kregg v Maldonado

Annotate this Case
Kregg v Maldonado 2013 NY Slip Op 07306 Released on November 8, 2013 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Released on November 8, 2013
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
1041 CA 12-01664

[*1]CHARLOTTE KREGG, AS GUARDIAN OF CHRISTOPHER M. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

EILEEN MALDONADO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AMERICAN SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION AND SUZUKI MOTOR CORPORATION OF JAPAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered January 25, 2012. The order denied the cross motion of plaintiff to compel defendants American Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan to further respond to her notice to produce.


LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO (THOMAS S. LANE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: The parties appear before us for a second time on a dispute over discovery (see Kregg v Maldonado, 98 AD3d 1289) in this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by Christopher M. Williams when he was driving a Suzuki motorcycle. Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff's cross motion to compel defendants American Suzuki Motor Corporation and Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan to further respond to plaintiff's notice to produce. Plaintiff's "bare allegations of relevancy" with respect to the information sought are insufficient to entitle plaintiff to that relief (Crazytown Furniture v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 150 AD2d 420, 421; see Dempski v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 249 AD2d 895, 896).
Entered: November 8, 2013
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.