McAleer v Quill
Annotate this Case
McAleer v Quill
2012 NY Slip Op 06472
Decided on September 28, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1014 CA 11-01741
[*1]MICHAEL MCALEER AND KRISTI MCALEER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
CHARLES G. QUILL, JR. AND CHARLES G. QUILL, DOING BUSINESS AS ROYAL PHEASANT SUPPER CLUB, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered January 25, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiffs' motion for an order setting aside the jury verdict and granting a new trial.
HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (TAMMY L. RIDDLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL A. RIEHLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1014 CA 11-01741
[*1]MICHAEL MCALEER AND KRISTI MCALEER, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
CHARLES G. QUILL, JR. AND CHARLES G. QUILL, DOING BUSINESS AS ROYAL PHEASANT SUPPER CLUB, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered January 25, 2011 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiffs' motion for an order setting aside the jury verdict and granting a new trial.
HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (TAMMY L. RIDDLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, BUFFALO (MICHAEL A. RIEHLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
