Tirado v Steinberg
Annotate this Case
Tirado v Steinberg
2012 NY Slip Op 06469
Decided on September 28, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1010 CA 12-00462
[*1]PHYLLIS TIRADO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF BILLY TIRADO, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
DANIEL STEINBERG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, DAVID L. CROWE AND DONALD L. CROWE, DEFENDANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Norman W. Seiter, Jr., J.), entered January 25, 2012 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant Daniel Steinberg for summary judgment.
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, SYRACUSE (LISA M. ROBINSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
STANLEY LAW OFFICES, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. QUATTROCCI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1010 CA 12-00462
[*1]PHYLLIS TIRADO, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF BILLY TIRADO, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
DANIEL STEINBERG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, DAVID L. CROWE AND DONALD L. CROWE, DEFENDANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Norman W. Seiter, Jr., J.), entered January 25, 2012 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant Daniel Steinberg for summary judgment.
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, SYRACUSE (LISA M. ROBINSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
STANLEY LAW OFFICES, LLP, SYRACUSE (ROBERT A. QUATTROCCI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
