Matter of Steward v Lucas
Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Steward v Lucas
2012 NY Slip Op 06464
Decided on September 28, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1003 CAF 11-00067
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF YVONNE STEWARD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
CARMELL . LUCAS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered December 30, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.
ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
AYOKA A. TUCKER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR PAULETTE L.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Kelly F. v Gregory A.F., 34 AD3d 1277).
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1003 CAF 11-00067
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF YVONNE STEWARD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
CARMELL . LUCAS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered December 30, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.
ELIZABETH CIAMBRONE, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
AYOKA A. TUCKER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR PAULETTE L.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Kelly F. v Gregory A.F., 34 AD3d 1277).
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
