Matter of Casella v City of Rochester

Annotate this Case
Matter of Casella v City of Rochester 2010 NY Slip Op 08278 [78 AD3d 1597] November 12, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2011

In the Matter of Robert Casella, Respondent, v City of Rochester et al., Appellants.

—[*1] Thomas S. Richards, Corporation Counsel, Rochester (Jeffrey Eichner of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria LLP, Buffalo (Richard D. Furlong of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Ann Marie Taddeo, J.), entered March 10, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, inter alia, granted the petition to compel compliance with a Freedom of Information Law demand.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present—Martoche, J.P., Sconiers, Green and Pine, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.