Verizon N.Y., Inc. v State of New York

Annotate this Case
Verizon N.Y., Inc. v State of New York 2010 NY Slip Op 08277 [78 AD3d 1597] November 12, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Verizon New York, Inc., Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

—[*1] James C. Cosgrove, Buffalo, for claimant-appellant. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of counsel), for defendant-respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Jeremiah J. Moriarty, III, J.), entered July 8, 2009. The interlocutory judgment apportioned liability 35% to defendant and 65% to claimant.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant commenced this action alleging that defendant damaged its underground telecommunication line while performing "sidewalk/bridge" repairs in the City of Niagara Falls. After a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, the Court of Claims determined that both parties were negligent and apportioned liability 65% to claimant and 35% to defendant.

We conclude upon our review of the record that the court properly attributed a greater portion of the fault to claimant (see Denio v State of New York, 11 AD3d 914, 915 [2004], amended on rearg 13 AD3d 1231 [2004], affd 7 NY3d 159 [2006]; Schmidt v State of New York, 21 Misc 3d 1114[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 52377[U] [2005], affd for reasons stated 39 AD3d 1237 [2007]; see generally Stewart v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 60 AD3d 445, 445-446 [2009]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Sconiers, Green and Pine, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.