Matter of Town of Onondaga v Ritter
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of Town of Onondaga, Petitioner, v Diana Jones Ritter, Commissioner, New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Respondent.
—[*1] Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse (Nadine C. Bell of counsel), for petitioner.
Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County [John C. Cherundolo, A.J.], entered June 1, 2010) to review a determination of respondent. The determination, among other things, adjudged that Community Options Inc. may seek to establish an individualized residential alternative at 5081 Rosemary Lane in the Town of Onondaga.
It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed for reasons stated in the decision of respondent New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.