Mohawk Val. Water Auth. v State of New York
Annotate this CaseMohawk Valley Water Authority, Respondent, v State of New York et al., Defendants, and Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P., Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)
—[*1] Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Syracuse (Douglas J. Nash of counsel), for defendant-appellant.
Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (Alan J. Pierce of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered April 24, 2008. The order denied the motion of defendant Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. to dismiss plaintiff's ninth and seventeenth causes of action and granted the motion of plaintiff for leave to file and serve an amended complaint.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 78 AD2d 913 [1980], affd 54 NY2d 185 [1981], rearg denied 55 NY2d 878 [1982]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.