Palladino v CNY Centro, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Palladino v CNY Centro, Inc.
2010 NY Slip Op 07057 [77 AD3d 1459]
October 1, 2010
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010
Eugene Palladino, Respondent,
v
CNY Centro, Inc., Respondent, and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 580, Appellant. Eugene Palladino, Respondent, v CNY Centro, Inc., Respondent, and Charles Watson, as Business Agent of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 580, et al., Appellants.
Eugene Palladino, Respondent,
v
CNY Centro, Inc., Respondent, and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 580, Appellant. Eugene Palladino, Respondent, v CNY Centro, Inc., Respondent, and Charles Watson, as Business Agent of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 580, et al., Appellants.
—[*1]Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Martoche, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Green, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
