Matter of Eleydie R. (Maria R.)

Annotate this Case
Matter of Eleydie R. (Maria R.) 2010 NY Slip Op 06979 [77 AD3d 1423] October 1, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010

In the Matter of Eleydie R., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Maria R., Appellant.

—[*1] Bernadette M. Hoppe, Buffalo, for respondent-appellant.

Joseph T. Jarzembek, Buffalo, for petitioner-respondent.

David C. Schopp, Attorney for the Child, the Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Charles D. Halvorsen of counsel), for Eleydie R.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.), entered July 14, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, terminated the parental rights of respondent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petition seeking to terminate the parental rights of respondent mother with respect to her youngest child on the ground of permanent neglect. The mother admitted that she permanently neglected the child, and the record of the dispositional hearing supports the court's determination that the best interests of the child would be served by terminating the mother's parental rights and freeing the child for adoption (see Matter of Saafir A.M., 28 AD3d 1217 [2006]). Contrary to the mother's contention, "where, as here, a parent admits to permanent neglect, there is no need for the [petitioner] to put forth evidence establishing—nor is it necessary for the court to determine—that the [petitioner] had exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship" (Matter of Aidan D., 58 AD3d 906, 908 [2009]; see Matter of Nestor H.O. [Nestor H.], 68 AD3d 1733 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.