Matter of Stanislaus-Fung v Vandusen

Annotate this Case
Matter of Stanislaus-Fung v VanDusen 2010 NY Slip Op 06905 [77 AD3d 1356] October 1, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010

In the Matter of Karen Stanislaus-Fung, on Behalf of Alexis V., an Infant, Respondent,
v
William VanDusen, Appellant, and Melissa L. Riggs, Respondent.

—[*1] John T. Nasci, Rome, for respondent-appellant.

Doreen M. St. Thomas, Clark Mills, for respondent-respondent.

Karen Stanislaus-Fung, Attorney for the Child, Clinton, petitioner-respondent pro se.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Brian M. Miga, J.), entered October 2, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted the petition for modification.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in VanDusen v Riggs (77 AD3d 1355 [2010] [decided herewith]). Present—Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.