People v Cruz

Annotate this Case
People v Cruz 2010 NY Slip Op 05965 [75 AD3d 1116] July 2, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 1, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eulese N. Cruz, Also Known as Marco Aguay, Appellant.

—[*1]The case is held, the decision is reserved, the motion to relieve counsel of assignment is granted and new counsel is to be assigned. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon his Alford plea of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [3]), and upon his guilty plea of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]). Defendant's assigned appellate counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38 [1979]). However, our review of the record reveals the existence of nonfrivolous issues for appeal, specifically, whether County Court erred in denying defendant's motion seeking to suppress the photo array identification of defendant, and whether there was sufficient evidence of guilt in the record to support defendant's Alford plea (see People v Richardson, 72 AD3d 1578 [2010]). Therefore, we relieve counsel of his assignment and assign new counsel to brief these issues, as well as any other issues that counsel's review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Kim Hawn Martusewicz, J.—Attempted Robbery, 1st Degree). Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.