People v Young

Annotate this Case
People v Young 2010 NY Slip Op 05197 [74 AD3d 1864] June 11, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Malcolm Young, Appellant.

—[*1] The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Michael C. Walsh of counsel), for defendant-appellant. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (J. Michael Marion of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), rendered January 5, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, attempted burglary in the third degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, resisting arrest and obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him after a nonjury trial of, inter alia, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 220.09 [1]) and attempted burglary in the third degree (§§ 110.00, 140.20), defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's failure to move for a trial order of dismissal. "We reject that contention, inasmuch as such [a] . . . motion would have had no chance of success" (People v Brown, 67 AD3d 1369, 1370 [2009]; see People v Webb, 60 AD3d 1291, 1292 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 930 [2009]), and "[t]here can be no denial of effective assistance of trial counsel arising from counsel's failure to 'make a motion or argument' that has little or no chance of success" (People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]). Contrary to defendant's further contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Finally, we note that the certificate of conviction misspells defendant's name, and incorrectly recites that defendant was convicted of a class B felony under the second count of the indictment and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a minimum of 1½ years under the third count of the indictment. The certificate of conviction therefore must be amended to include the proper spelling of defendant's name, and to recite that defendant was convicted of a class C felony under the second count of the indictment and was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a minimum of 11/3 years under the third count of the indictment (see generally People v Saxton, 32 AD3d 1286 [2006]). Present—Smith, J.P., Lindley, Sconiers, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.