Fraccola v Fraccola
Annotate this CaseAlbert G. Fraccola, Jr., Appellant, v Phyllis Fraccola, Respondent, et al., Defendants.
—[*1] Albert G. Fraccola, Jr., plaintiff-appellant pro se.
Felt Evans, LLP, Clinton (Jay G. Williams, III, of counsel), for defendant-respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered February 5, 2009. The order, among other things, granted the motion of defendant Phyllis Fraccola for summary judgment.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni, Sconiers and Pine, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.