Matter of City of Rome v Railroad Prop. Dev. Corp.

Annotate this Case
Matter of City of Rome v Railroad Prop. Dev. Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 03585 [72 AD3d 1561] April 30, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 9, 2010

In the Matter of City of Rome, Respondent, v Railroad Property Development Corp., Appellant.

—[*1] Abbie Goldbas, Utica, for respondent-appellant.

Diane M. Martin-Grande, Corporation Counsel, Rome, for petitioner-respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered April 13, 2009. The order granted petitioner's application for an administrative search warrant.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on April 6 and 19, 2010, and by Stephanie Eisenberg for respondent on April 8, 2010,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Peradotto, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.