LT Propco, LLC v Carousel Ctr. Co., L.P.

Annotate this Case
LT Propco, LLC v Carousel Ctr. Co., L.P. 2010 NY Slip Op 02397 [71 AD3d 1550] March 19, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010

LT Propco, LLC, Appellant, v Carousel Center Company, L.P., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Lord & Taylor Carousel, Inc., Appellant,
v
Carousel Center Company, L.P., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.) Kaufmann's Carousel, Inc., Appellant, v Carousel Center Company, L.P., et al., Respondents. (Action No. 3.) In the Matter of City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Interests in the Carousel Center Site, Which Site is Generally Identified as 1 Carousel Center Drive (Lot 11K), SBL No. 114-02-05.6; 304 Hiawatha Boulevard W. Rear (Lot 11B), SBL No. 114-02-05.2 in the City of Syracuse, New York, Which Parcels Comprise a Portion of the Site for the Phased Public Project Known as Destiny USA. Lord & Taylor Carousel, Inc., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, Respondent, to Acquire Certain Interests in the Carousel Center Site, Which Site is Generally Identified as 1 Carousel Center Drive (Lot 11K), SBL No. 114-02-05.6; 304 Hiawatha Boulevard W. Rear (Lot 11B), SBL No. 114-02-05.2 in the City of Syracuse, New York, Which Parcels Comprise a Portion of the Site for the Phased Public Project Known as Destiny USA. Kaufmann's Carousel, Inc., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) (Appeal No. 3.)

—[*1]Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.