Matter of Blixt v Blixt
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of Daniel S. Blixt, Respondent, v Hilary J. Blixt, Appellant.
—[*1] John A. Herbowy, Rome, for respondent-appellant.
Fessenden, Laumer & DeAngelo, Jamestown (Peter R. Johnson of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.
Sandra Fisher Swanson, Law Guardian, Jamestown, for Abigail J.B. and Ellie S.B.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Michael F. Griffith, J.), entered June 5, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded sole custody of the parties' children to petitioner.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the report of the Referee at Family Court. Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.