Matter of Blixt v Blixt

Annotate this Case
Matter of Blixt v Blixt 2010 NY Slip Op 02289 [71 AD3d 1480] March 19, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010

In the Matter of Daniel S. Blixt, Respondent, v Hilary J. Blixt, Appellant.

—[*1] John A. Herbowy, Rome, for respondent-appellant.

Fessenden, Laumer & DeAngelo, Jamestown (Peter R. Johnson of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

Sandra Fisher Swanson, Law Guardian, Jamestown, for Abigail J.B. and Ellie S.B.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Michael F. Griffith, J.), entered June 5, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded sole custody of the parties' children to petitioner.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the report of the Referee at Family Court. Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.