People v Oakley

People v Oakley 2010 NY Slip Op 02287 [71 AD3d 1479] March 19, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Collin D. Oakley, Jr., Appellant.

—[*1] Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Leslie E. Swift of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John R. Schwartz, A.J.), rendered January 17, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in failing to determine whether he should be afforded youthful offender status (see People v Ficchi, 64 AD3d 1195 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 859 [2009]; People v Fowler, 28 AD3d 1183 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 788 [2006]). In any event, that contention is without merit inasmuch as defendant was "previously . . . adjudicated a youthful offender following conviction of a felony," and he therefore was ineligible for youthful offender treatment with respect to the instant conviction (CPL 720.10 [2] [c]; see People v Robinson, 145 AD2d 949 [1988], lv denied 73 NY2d 981 [1989]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ.