Englert v Schaffer

Annotate this Case
Englert v Schaffer 2010 NY Slip Op 01086 [70 AD3d 1314] February 11, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Leonard M. Englert et al., Respondents, v Gerald W. Schaffer, Jr., Esq., et al., Individually and Doing Business as The Barnes Firm, as Successors in Interest to Cellino & Barnes, et al., Appellants.

—[*1] Mark R. Uba, Williamsville (Christine Uba of counsel), for defendants-appellants.

Burke and Burke, Rochester (Patrick J. Burke of counsel) and S. Robert Williams, PLLC, Syracuse, for plaintiffs-respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David Michael Barry, J.), entered January 9, 2009 in a legal malpractice action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the cross motion of defendants seeking to disqualify plaintiffs' attorneys from jointly representing plaintiffs.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendants appeal from that part of an order that denied their cross motion seeking to disqualify plaintiffs' attorneys from jointly representing plaintiffs. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendants have standing to bring the motion (see Lake v Kaleida Health, 60 AD3d 1469 [2009]; Maxon v Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, 45 AD3d 1376 [2007]), we conclude that defendants are not aggrieved by Supreme Court's denial of their cross motion, and the appeal therefore must be dismissed (see CPLR 5511). Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.