Dischiavi v Calli
Annotate this CaseGary M. Dischiavi et al., Appellants, v William S. Calli et al., Defendants, and Thomas S. Soja, Respondent. (Appeal No. 3.)
—[*1] Luibrand Law Firm, PLLC, Latham (Kevin A. Luibrand of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Getnick Livingston Atkinson Gigliotti & Priore, LLP, Utica (Patrick G. Radel of counsel), for defendant-respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered November 25, 2008. The judgment dismissed the complaint against defendant Thomas S. Soja.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied in part and the complaint against defendant Thomas S. Soja is reinstated.
Same memorandum as in Dischiavi v Calli ([appeal No. 2] 68 AD3d 1691 [2009]). Present—Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.