Rohde v Duell
Annotate this CaseRaymond W. Rohde, Jr., Plaintiff, v William H. Duell, Doing Business as Pennwood Construction, Respondent, and Chilson-Wilcox, Inc., et al., Appellants.
—[*1] Goldberg Segalla LLP, Rochester (Patrick B. Naylon of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
Mura & Strom, PLLC, Buffalo (James M. DeVoy of counsel), for defendant-respondent.
Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered September 21, 2006. The order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the cross claims of defendants Chilson-Wilcox, Inc., Chilson-Wilcox Realty, LLC, Scott W. Chilson and Jay E. Wilcox against defendant William H. Duell, doing business as Pennwood Construction, seeking common-law indemnification and/or contractual indemnification.
It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.