Buja v Shepard Niles, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Buja v Shepard Niles, Inc. 2007 NY Slip Op 08640 [45 AD3d 1391] November 9, 2007 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Kevin Buja, Respondent, v Shepard Niles, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

—[*1] Feldman, Kieffer & Herman, LLP, Buffalo (Adam C. Ferrandino of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Faraci Lange, LLP, Rochester (Carol A. McKenna of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered October 5, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant Shepard Niles, Inc. to vacate a default judgment entered against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Shepard Niles, Inc. (defendant) appeals from an order denying its motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it in this personal injury action. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that no reasonable excuse had been offered for defendant's default in answering the complaint (see CB Richard Ellis v JLC Holdings, 306 AD2d 870 [2003]; see also Johnson v McFadden Ford, 278 AD2d 907 [2000]; cf. Steinbarth v Otis El. Co., 244 AD2d 930 [1997]). Given the failure of defendant to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default, we need not address whether it demonstrated a meritorious defense to the action (see Smolinski v Smolinski, 13 AD3d 1188, 1189 [2004]; Solorzano v Cucinelli Family, 1 AD3d 887, 887-888 [2003]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.