Matter of Gist v Cusak

Annotate this Case
Matter of Gist v Cusak 2007 NY Slip Op 08632 [45 AD3d 1388] November 9, 2007 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

In the Matter of Marilyn Gist, Petitioner, v Joan Cusak et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Clarence Q. Johnson, Syracuse, for petitioner.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marlene O. Tuczinski of counsel), for respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County [Deborah H. Karalunas, J.], entered October 12, 2006) to review a determination of respondents. The determination denied petitioner's application for benefits to pay for the funeral expenses of her son.

It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Lunn and Peradotto, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.