Rashford v Randazzo

Annotate this Case
Rashford v Randazzo 2007 NY Slip Op 02243 [38 AD3d 1261] March 16, 2007 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Angela Rashford, Respondent, v Arthur Randazzo, Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)

—[*1] Gustave J. DeTraglia, Jr., Utica, for defendant-appellant.

Thomas F. O'Brien, Clinton, for plaintiff-respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, A.J.), entered December 2, 2005. The order denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.