Wipper v Hobart & William Smith Coll.
Annotate this Case
Wipper v Hobart & William Smith Coll.
2006 NY Slip Op 08578 [34 AD3d 1358]
November 17, 2006
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Emily Wipper, Appellant, v Hobart and William Smith College et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Appeal No. 2.)
Emily Wipper, Appellant, v Hobart and William Smith College et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (Appeal No. 2.)
—[*1]Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (James R. Harvey, A.J.), entered June 15, 2005. The order granted the motion of defendants Hobart and William Smith College, Clarence E. Butler, Dunbar Moodie, Mark D. Gearan, Jane Doe(s) and John Doe(s) to dismiss the complaint against them.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche and Green, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
