Fahrenholz v Security Mut. Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Fahrenholz v Security Mut. Ins. Co. 2006 NYSlipOp 07026 September 29, 2006 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Thomas Fahrenholz, Respondent, v Security Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, and The Kreiner Company, Inc., Respondent. (Appeal No. 1.)

—[*1]Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered May 11, 2005. The order, among other things, granted those parts of the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment on the cause of action seeking reformation of a policy of insurance and partial summary judgment on liability on the cause of action for breach of contract.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.