Reena Kumar v Jeffrey A. Tisack

Annotate this Case
Kumar v Tisack 2006 NY Slip Op 05560 [31 AD3d 1226] July 7, 2006 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Reena Kumar et al., Respondents, v Jeffrey A. Tisack, Appellant.

—[*1]Motion for reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.